top of page

Interview 10: Multiversum & Mathematics

HS: Could you explain the multiversum theory, and by doing so giving me a chance to understand?

AI: Certainly! The multiverse theory, also known as the many-worlds interpretation, is a hypothesis in theoretical physics and philosophy that suggests that there may be multiple universes or parallel universes, each with its own unique set of physical laws and properties.

The basic idea behind this theory is that every time a quantum event occurs, such as the decay of an atomic nucleus, the universe splits into multiple branches, with each branch representing a different outcome of that event. So, in one universe, the nucleus may decay, while in another, it may not.

This means that there could be an infinite number of universes, each with its own unique history, branching off from our own universe every time a quantum event occurs. This theory is often used to explain the strange and seemingly paradoxical behaviour of particles at the quantum level, such as the ability of a particle to exist in multiple states at the same time, known as superposition.

The multiverse theory has been the subject of much debate and speculation in the scientific community, as it is difficult to test or prove. However, it remains an intriguing idea that continues to captivate the imaginations of scientists and non-scientists alike.

HS: Max Tegmark proposed the theory of the mathematical univers some 10 years ago; as his thoughts were intriguing, I ask what did happen to this theory.

AI: Max Tegmark's theory of the Mathematical Universe Hypothesis (MUH) proposes that our physical reality is ultimately based on mathematics. According to this hypothesis, not only are mathematical structures descriptive of the physical world, but they also constitute the physical world itself.

Tegmark's theory was received with a mixed response from the scientific community. While some found it intriguing, others criticized it as being untestable or unfalsifiable, which are qualities that are generally considered undesirable in scientific theories.

Despite this criticism, Tegmark's work has contributed to ongoing discussions about the nature of reality and the role of mathematics in physics. Some researchers have proposed new experiments and observations that could potentially provide evidence in favour of or against the MUH.

Overall, Tegmark's theory remains an interesting and thought-provoking idea in the field of theoretical physics, but it has yet to gain widespread acceptance as a viable scientific theory. However, as our understanding of the universe continues to evolve, it is possible that new evidence may emerge that could lend support to Tegmark's ideas or lead to the development of alternative theories.

bottom of page